CPI The Lebanese Center for Public Information
PARTICIPATIVE
GOVERNANCE
PARTICIPATIVE GOVERNANCE

    Lebanon at the cross roads (part one)
    A review of the country’s past performance and a road map for the future.

    “A government of the people, by the people, and for the people.” Extracts of the Gettysburg
    address by Abraham Lincoln.

    1.        THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE CITIZENS AT THE OUTSET OF THE CIVIL WAR

    In 1990, after coming out of a civil war that had lasted fifteen years, all the citizens longed for, at
    the time, was a halt to the violence and resuming a normal life. But as peace finally took hold
    their demands grew. Essentially they pleaded for political stability and security, social justice and
    adequate social services for all, a balanced national economic growth, a fair distribution of the
    country’s resources, and a sound and effective management of the public finances.

    We shall presently examine if these wishes were ultimately realized.

    2.        THE REALITY OF THE PAST TWENTY YEARS

    1)        Political Stability: No one can deny that political stability, both internal and external, has
    been, to say the least, precarious during the past twenty years. Many external factors have
    evidently contributed to create instability in the country.

    However we believe that the different governments who were in charge during that period should
    have worked harder to preserve and foster national harmony without which no country can enjoy
    political stability.

    These governments did not seek and encourage the participation of the citizens in the
    reconstruction of the country’s institutions. In fact, just the opposite occurred. The citizens were
    marginalized, kept out of the public process, and discouraged from getting involved in matters
    related to governance. This policy was probably pursued to prevent the citizens from having
    access to information that the decision makers misguidedly thought should not be part of the
    public domain. Later in this study we shall demonstrate the serious consequences of this short
    sighted policy.

    The chasm created by this exclusion contributed, to a certain extent, to widen the rift among the
    different religious communities and between the two main political groups. It negatively impacted
    the country’s unity and cohesion and, on several occasions, it even threatened to revive the civil
    war.

    .2)        Social justice: Essential services, like quality education and affordable health and
    retirement security were never fully provided to the citizens in the past. Lately, with a creeping
    inflation and a high imported cost of living, these facilities have become nearly out of reach for the
    low income earners and even for some members of the middle class.

    3)        Infrastructure: Insignificant amounts have been spent on the national infrastructure during
    the past twenty years, leaving it in a state of near disrepair. According to the present Minister of
    Economy, no less than twenty billion US dollars will be needed to rebuild or update the water and
    the energy supply systems, the roads, the ports, the public transport, the waste collection and
    treating systems etc.

    4)        Economic Growth:  During the past years international observers have hailed Lebanon’s
    economic growth and the resilience of its financial and monetary systems. One cannot deny that
    some sectors of the economy like real estate, construction, insurance, and banking have
    witnessed a spectacular boom during that period. This growth however has been accompanied
    by a serious fall back in many other sectors, like agriculture, and industry and some stagnation in
    the
    domain of telecommunications.  Even tourism compares somewhat unfavorably with the
    performance of other neighboring countries like Cyprus, Jordan, Egypt, Turkey and Syria. This
    has brought many economists to challenge the justification of the high growth development
    product rate (GDP) claimed by the authorities.

    5)        Fair distribution of public revenue: All the above shortcomings coupled with a skewed
    financial and fiscal policy, and the absence of an effective management of the country’s public
    debt, have contributed to bring about an uneven distribution of the country’s earnings and
    resources. A relatively small proportion of the population, the bankers, the real estate investors,
    and the large entrepreneurs, are getting substantially richer, while the members of the middle
    and the low income class have seen their revenue dwindle substantially.

    Emigration has partially compensated for these deficiencies but it has also resulted in a brain
    drain of the population that is bound to seriously mortgage the prospects of the country’s future
    economic development. Already most of the government ministries in Lebanon suffer from an
    acute shortage of young and qualified personnel who are urgently required to implement a
    meaningful and badly needed reform within the Public Administration.

    6)        Management of public funds: For all the above considerations it is fair to assume that the
    past management of public funds has been less than satisfactory. We find ourselves, twenty
    years later, with a staggering public debt of nearly sixty billion US dollars, a recurring yearly deficit
    of four billion US dollars, and nothing much to show for it in terms of security, stability, social
    justice, and economic prosperity.


    3.         LEBANON TODAY IS, ONCE MORE, AT THE CROSS ROADS. WHAT OPTIONS DO WE
    HAVE?

    We can keep fumbling along and go from bad to worse, or we can seize this unique opportunity
    to let the citizens participate in their country’s governance.

    Ever since we gained our independence, the decision makers in our country kept forgetting that
    they owe their authority to the citizens who elected them and that they should always refer to the
    people whenever they have to make some important choices that can potentially impact the
    present or the future of these citizens.

    Unfortunately, as we previously pointed out, our leaders have constantly underestimated the
    ability of the citizens to make the right decisions and purposely avoided consulting them. As proof
    of this assertion we would like to point out that no popular referendum was ever held in Lebanon,
    even at times when the fate of the country was in the balance.

    At a time when some hard decisions must be taken, our leaders should imperatively associate
    the citizens to the governance of this country and keep them regularly and thoroughly informed of
    any new major developments. This democratic process, fully recommended and strongly
    supported by the major international institutions, is commonly known as participative governance.

    Before we consider how it should operate in practice, I would like to quote Marwan Muasher, a
    political analyst and a strong supporter of citizens ‘rights in participation.  Here are some extracts
    from his article:

    The Arab Spring – Eternal season of flux.  “On the need to associate the Arab citizens to the
    governance process to preserve the gains of the Arab Spring.”

    “ But it would be a mistake for governments that now enjoy legitimacy — including Saudi Arabia,
    but also Jordan and Morocco — not to use the time they have to undergo serious reform that
    leads not just to better economic conditions but to better governance and power sharing.
    Despite all the difficulties, it is wrong to assume that this historic moment will die. Too much has
    changed, and it’s too late to reverse course. What has been broken is not just the barrier of fear
    but, more important, the feeling of powerlessness.
    The Arab public, accustomed to being on the receiving end of policies made by its governments
    or outside forces, has a new sense of empowerment — the feeling that it can effect change. This
    is a new development in the region, and it is there to stay.
    But while the street has been successful in starting revolution, it cannot institutionalize change.
    Countries need to manage an orderly transition. They need to put forward a serious reform
    process rather than ad hoc measures designed to pacify the street.”

    As Mr. Muasher so rightly puts it, time is running out in the Middle East. It is also the case for us in
    Lebanon if we do not want to witness a repeat of the fifteen years of civil discord and internal
    strife that plagued us in the past.

    In a subsequent article we shall examine how one can bring the citizens of Lebanon to
    participate in their country’s governance and the advantages of this new partnership.

    George Sabat
    CPI The Lebanese Center for public information
    “Inform before you Reform!”


A1.Introduction



    CPI The Lebanese Center for Public Information

  • Who we are
           A not for profit association formed and registered in September 2006
    with the Ministry of Interior under reference 450 AD

  • Our contacts

    We can be reached: Tel. No. 961 04 415779 or 03 461450
    Email: George@cpi-lebanon.org
    Web site: http://www.cpi-lebanon.org

  • Our Mission
           Launch and maintain a permanent and open dialogue between the
    State and the citizens.

  • Our Program

  1. Convince the Authorities and the citizens of the necessity to work
    together to build a united and prosperous Lebanon for all.
  2. Seek and collect public information, then share it and evaluate it with
    the citizens
  3. Introduce and promote participative governance, participative
    budgeting and participative planning.

  • Our Goal
           The drafting of a five year Social and Economic Development
    Plan that will be the joint product of the Authorities and the citizens and that
    will define their combined national unity of purpose.